The participants involved in the project consortium include Universidad De Cantabria, Acciona Infraestructuras, Fraunhofer, European Union Road Federation (ERF), Tecnalia, Norwegian Graphite, BSRIA, Institute for Transport Sciences (KTI) and Sia Inženierbuve (IB).
BSRIA’s role in this project is to conduct the Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing Analysis of the proposed road design by establishing a base case scenario similar to the existing roads to then compare it with the modified alternative designs.
This project targets two problems associated with the road industry:
- Deterioration of asphalt surfaces - addressing the technical limitation of current materials and procedures, negative effects of extreme weather conditions due to climate change and increase of traffic loads due to the opening of freight corridors.
- Unsustainability of the road sector - addressing the intensive use of natural resources i.e. aggregates and fuel, greenhouse gas emissions and low recycling rate. The base case of the road is being established based on the environmental product declaration (EPD) of a cleavage of a Spanish road, N-340 in Sector E-40, Elche (Alicante) given by Acciona Infraestructura. The alternative designs will use warm mix asphalts (WMA) incorporating the nanomaterial-modified bituminous binders (NMB), including the addition of recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) and by-products. Asphalt concrete, porous asphalt and BBTM mixes types are also expected to be designed.
This project proposes two solutions to the problems identified above in the road industry by:
- Evaluation and optimization of road related materials and procedures.
- Development and validation of advanced, more durable, and eco-friendly asphalt materials.
The first stage of evaluation and optimization of road-related materials and procedures will be conducted by first quantifying the impacts of climate change and of the traffic loads in freight corridors on the EU road network. Then, an evaluation of the constraints on road materials and the road construction, maintenance, rehabilitation techniques to withstand challenges coming from climate change and freight corridors will be conducted. By defining the optimization criteria on durability, safety, cost-effectiveness, environmental-friendliness and socio-economic factors, using life-time engineering concepts and multi-criteria analysis, the best practices will be identified.
The second stage of development and validation of advanced; more durable and eco-friendly asphalt materials will involve selection, analysis and characterization of carbon nanomaterials with good compatibility towards organic matrices like polymers and bitumen. The alternative materials suggested as additions into the road material mix include nanomaterial-modified polymers, nanomaterial-modified bituminous binders (NMB), small quantities of steel slag as a substitute to aggregates and warm mix asphalts (WMA) incorporating the NMB, including the addition of recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) and by-products. Asphalt concrete, porous asphalt and BBTM mixes types are expected to be designed. By conducting a Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing Analysis, the objective is to understand the environmental impact of constructing a road which will be compared with the alternate cases on development and addition of warm mix asphalts to the road mix to identify the most suitable material mix.
After implementation and validation of two DURABROADS pavements at a real scale, these materials are suggested to be incorporated into the road construction material mix.
About DurabRoads and this article
This article has been produced in the context of the DURABROADS Project. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement n°605404. All information in this document is provided “as s” and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is fit for any particular purpose. The user thereof uses the information at its sole risk and liability. For the avoidance of all doubts, the European Commission has no liability in respect of this document, which is merely representing the author’s view.